|
The
previously healthy ten month old plaintiff developed febrile seizures
associated with a high fever. The parents called 911 to request
an ambulance at their home. The 911 operator dispatched an
ambulance as well as two local police cruisers. The ambulance
got lost on its way to the home resulting in a thirteen minute delay
in the response time. During that time, police from the town
were at the home attempting to provide directions to the ambulance
crew, which declined assistance.
Once
at the home, the ambulance crew nonchalantly attended to the child who
was suffering continuous seizures. On assessment, the child was
noted to be hypoxic with a blood oxygen saturation of 78%. The
ambulance team loaded the child into the ambulance and departed for
the hospital. En route, the crew received an order from the
medical control officer at the hospital to give the child Valium to
control her seizures and reestablish proper breathing. The
paramedic realized at that point that he had forgotten the key to the
locked narcotics cabinet and therefore could not gain access to the
necessary medication. A second ambulance was dispatched to the
original ambulance’s station to pick up the narcotics key and
intercept the first team en route to the hospital. There was an
additional ten minute delay in the administration of Valium as a
result of the forgotten key to the narcotics cabinet. By the
time the child arrived at the hospital, she had been oxygen deprived
for approximately forty minutes. She was eventually diagnosed
with profound brain injury.
The
minor plaintiff, who is presently five years old, is a spastic
quadriplegic who is wheelchair bound and fed by a gastrostomy tube.
She cannot communicate and dependant on others for all of her
needs.
In
discovery, it was determined that the negligent paramedic who prepared the
ambulance run report had allegedly falsified a number of important
items in the report, including the times of administration of
medication as well as numerous vital signs.
The
defendant claimed that any delay in the administration of seizure
control medication did not change the outcome. They further
contended that the minor plaintiff’s seizures were so severe that
they could not be controlled in the pre-hospital setting.
Defendant also argued that the minor plaintiff’s life expectancy was
significantly less than the 55 year life expectancy which the
plaintiffs claimed and that the cost of care of the minor plaintiff
was significantly less than what the plaintiffs claimed.
Claims
for the severe personal injuries were brought on behalf of the minor plaintiff and her parents
for the medical malpractice of the ambulance attendants against
the ambulance company only pursuant to G.L. c. 111, § 14. The law
prohibits claims against emergency medical technicians individually
but permits claims against the employer who may be held vicariously
liable for the negligence of its employees.
This
EMT malpractice case settled following two days of mediation in the capable hands of
Boston attorney, John Fitzgerald. |